Usefilm Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Film and Digital Photography

 
User Activity
Image Summary
Awards Received
Portfolio Summary
Critiques from Martin
Critiques to Martin
Featured Critiques

Portfolios

Categories
Abstracts (13)
Alternative Process (10)
Architecture (17)
At Work (25)
Candids (98)
Children (80)
Cityscape (7)
Commercial (101)
Deep Blue (2)
Digital (12)
Fashion (8)
Florals (3)
From The Field (172)
Historical (18)
Humor (4)
Journalism (45)
Landscape (19)
Macro (5)
Minimalist (1)
Nature (9)
Panoramic (1)
People (52)
Pets (3)
Photoart (5)
Portrait (63)
Sports (19)
Stage (3)
Still Life (22)
Street (34)
Studio Photography (55)
Transportation (36)
Travel (12)
Weddings (2)
Wildlife (15)


Featured Critiques by Photographer 


  1


Critique By: Martin .  (K:24362) Donor  
3/21/2006 8:54:19 AM

Ant,

I thought I died and went to heaven. My kind of town. The pickup on the left, the hidden house on the left and the cross on top of the steeple makes this way cool.

Not to mention the angles are out of site. Ask anyone, wrong angles drive me nuts, but the church is almost perfectly plumb and horizonally correct. While the light post and sign on the left lean to to right? Did you use a fisheye lens?

Well done and my hat is off to you...

Very angelic indeed my friend,

Marty
        Photo By: Anson Moye  (K:3480)

Critique By: Martin .  (K:24362) Donor  
11/12/2005 8:31:56 AM

Sheila,

I think you are an Artist, but how do you develope film twice?

This is a "Timeless Masterpiece" IMHO... You have done what most of us try to do, our whole lives...

I do love your style regarding the 400 ISO grain look, but do you ever choose anything with less grain?

I did my grainy thing with my self's, but that was 1600 ISO and digital is much more forgiving, than film? When I shoot film you will find that I do not go over 200 ISO with 35mm and 125 ISO in MF... Sup?

Marty
        Photo By: Sheila Carson  (K:5924)

Critique By: Martin .  (K:24362) Donor  
9/26/2005 9:48:16 PM

Eleisa,

I love this capture. I didn't even think twice about this being over exposed at all, but I'll answer the question you asked Ciprian...

Yes, you can adjust the brightness after you pull the trigger... I will give you a more detailed report if you want.

I hope you don't mind, but I did touch up the upper half of this fine capture... Now it's probably underexposed... ;( I hope I can help?

Well done my friend,

Martin
        Photo By: Eleisa Martin  (K:2579)

Critique By: Martin .  (K:24362) Donor  
9/9/2005 10:32:55 PM

Melisa,

I do love the DOF and the detail regarding this capture. Although, I might have shot it using 1/60 @ f/8 and 1/30 @ f/11, as well?

The beauty of digital is, we can shoot as many frames, that we would like and it doesn't cost us a dime more...

I still need to remember I'm not shooting film... My Canon 20D is still set on the single frame Mode... lol ... And it fires off @ 5 fps up to 23 frames, while set on jpeg fine...

Martin
        Photo By: Melisa Meyers  (K:9661)

Critique By: Martin .  (K:24362) Donor  
8/12/2005 9:57:59 PM

nicole,

I cropped it pretty hard, but not much else? I think the Rembrandt Triangle under the left eye is 2nd to none. Not to mention the triangles regarding the arms. Your lighting on the triangle is awesome and the pose is wonderful?

Martin
        Photo By: nicole miller  (K:889)

Critique By: Martin .  (K:24362) Donor  
8/7/2005 1:40:26 AM

Kevin,

Try to shot with slow film and a slow shutter speed. ISO 100 @ 1/125, or 1/60... My 1st shots were boring shot a 1/250, or 1/500...

The following photo is around 1/125 and panning is very important... Get good at panning with no vertical movement...

Martin
        Photo By: Kevin Settles  (K:638)


  1


|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2005 Photo Publishing Group, LLC - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.3554688