|
|
| Photographer |
Becky V {K:9699}
|
| Project |
N/A
|
Camera Model |
Yashica FX-3
|
| Categories |
Landscape
Infrared
|
Film Format |
|
| Portfolio |
black & white and toned all over
BC and Alberta scenery
|
Lens |
42-75mm
|
| Uploaded |
10/11/2005 |
Film / Memory Type |
Kodak HIE
|
| |
|
ISO / Film Speed |
0 |
| Views |
369 |
Shutter |
1/60
|
| Favorites |
0
|
Aperture |
f/11 |
| Critiques |
5 |
Rating |
Critique Only Image
|
| Location |
City - Progress
State - BC
Country - Canada
|
| About |
Back to Summer '04. It was with great trepidation I took a roll of IR with me on my journey up north. My previous two IR forays were disappointing, to say the least. This time around, things went really well. Exposure-wise, most photos are quite satisfactory, although I find most of the shots on this roll a bit boring (plus the sky was uncooperatively overcast the whole time). Anyway, I thought this shot was cool when I took it, but looking at it now, I'm not so sure. I probably should have stood on the topmost rail for more height (despite my poor relationship with gravity). What do you think?
Filter: Tiffen Red 25
|
|
Random Pictures By:
Becky
V
|
|
There are 5 Comments in 1 Pages
1
|
|
|
Kevin Lanthier
{K:5204} 10/11/2005
|
Heya, nice pastoral, grainy B&W. Those seem to be going around for BC-based Usefilm photographers right now, eh?
On the topic of gravity, a gentleman named Dave Scougal has made the case to me that gravity is the inherent enemy of the photographer. Anyone who's ever droped a lens can see the direct consequence of this, but it plays itself out in so many smaller ways as well. Just a thought.
As for the image at hand, I think moreso than anything you're just lacking subject a bit. It has that cool IR look, but I really want to see something being corraled aside from perhaps the photographer. In terms of composition, perhaps getting atop a post may have helped, but I'd be inclined to move over a little to the left so that the dominant fenceline running away from the the lens was closer to the 1/3 area of the image, which would find the horizon (already at about 1/3 the other way) at a compositionally pleasing point, quickly zeroing the eye there.
Actually, on that note, this might be more interesting as a vertical...
|
whaddayathink? |
|
|
|
|
Audrey Reid
{K:5872} 10/11/2005
|
Hi Becky, What a really nice/well thought out critique from Kevin above.
I was here earlier and thought nice sky and fences and yes a bit too many lines going this way and that. Had considered maybe a crop to the right may lessen the 'heavy feel'. But Kevin's 'vertical' is perfect.
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 10/11/2005
|
That is a boring sky to you?! BC must be spoiling you rotten with drama-skies. Exposure looks very good and I happen to like the wide composition you present, framing the view on both sides with trees is a good thing (c) IMHO. Good use of IR...
|
|
|
|
|
Becky V
{K:9699} 10/15/2005
|
Thanks so much for your thoughtful critiques everyone!
Kevin: Something was bugging me about this photo and you put your finger right on it: definitive subject! I think you're right. I really like your vertical crop - it gives the photo a lot more depth by pulling the eye into the photo rather than across it. Thanks for the suggestion!
Stefan: I lucked out with the sky here. The afternoon started out partly cloudy, then clouded over with high, white cloud, then a storm blew in about the time I got this shot. Most of my shots were taken in the "high, white cloud" period. I'm so impatient. 
|
|
|
|
|
Kunal Mehta
{K:2484} 10/21/2005
|
I like Kevin's vertical crop for this image. Vertical crop gives good perspective to the image rather than baffling a viewer to find subject and correlate that subject to entire image.
|
|
|
|
