Markus Scholz
(K=22839) - Comment Date 1/13/2006
|
Just happened when I selectet "critiques to" Teunis Haveman:
Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a000d'
Type mismatch: 'RecordCount'
/include/Show_Recent_Critiques_Include_3_full.asp, line 811
Markus
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/14/2006
|
Thanks Markus, will keep an eye on it, it isn't failing at the moment.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Ann Nida
(K=45230) - Comment Date 1/14/2006
|
I saw this when the upgrade was first done and have been going to mention it but with you guys being so busy I dind't think it was important. Now that things have quietened down some and you have a pretty good handle on the bugs I'll ask this question.
Why are there 2 "Add Photos" links in 2 different drop down menus?
One is Under "Home" and the other is under "Photo Critique". Isn't one superfluous? Does each one have a different purpose or do they both do the same thing?
Just thought I'd ask.
Cheers - Ann :)
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/14/2006
|
I notice that the average of comments per image is based on the total number of images uploaded, not deducting the ones that have later been deleted. Could this be changed to the average of the number that are actually still visible on the site? It would sure help my average!
Different Topic... this time apparently an actual bug.
The "back" arrows on my browser (Opera 8.4) has started occasionally taking me NOT to the page I was looking at before but some earlier, quite different page. This is just an initial flag. I'll be keeping an eye out for any repetitions and consistencies that might trap the bug.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/14/2006
|
When do you think you'll be able to get around to fix the ratings, so that a search for "top rated" photographs from "all Usfilm" gives a meaningful result? Do you intend to alter the weighting system again? If so, my suggestion would be that people like me, who very rarely rate and usually only to give a 6 or a 7 to something really outstanding, should not be penalized by having their 6s and 7s downgraded. My 7, I have calculated by watching what it does to the average, is effectively a 6, and can actually drag the average DOWN for an outstanding photo that has attracted mostly 7s from those whose ratings are not discounted in this way. This makes me increasingly reluctant to rate anything at all...
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/14/2006
|
I now quite frequently see banner ads. I thought this was fixed.
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/14/2006
|
One thing at a time roger relax we're on it.
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/14/2006
|
Roger, Check your image and comment counts, should be more accurate now. What page are you seeing the banner ads on.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Matej Maceas
(K=24381) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
Menu position on the screen is off. Have to scroll sideways to access My Usefilm. (firefox 1.0.4)
|
|
...
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
The photo count is now accurate. But the average of comments dropped from 9.88 per image to 8. Why would that be? Most of the ones I deleted had either zero or one comment, so I was expecting the average to rise. Perhaps you have stopped counting "own comments"? This would be fair, and many have requested it... perhaps in the hope that it would discourage all those "thank you" comments. I mostly comment under my own photos to answer questions about the photo, so I've never cared very much either way.
To answer your question, I was seeing banner ads at the top of forums. It isn't happening today. So far.
Glad to know that you are working on the ratings filter.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
Unfiltered "Comments to me" now has a banner ad. I'll add any others i come across.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
Reply to a comment (from a donor) also had a banner ad across the top of the page. Do you want me to keep flagging you on these? It seems to me you have enough to indicate a serious problem with your donor option "not" to see banner ads. That disturbs me more for the sake of Usefilm, which surely doesn't want to annoy donors, than the ads disturb me personally. I really, really do want Usefilm to thrive...
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
Roger, keep letting me know as you find them please. Actually the pages where they are showing up are mostly pages that have not been expanded out to the full page, so I can kill 2 birds with one stone.
Thanks for your help
Phil
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
Roger, in the previous calculation which was in error, it was also counting attachment images and the photographer portrait in the number of images, which should not have been counted. IT is pretty simple math, it takes the number of active images and number of active critiques and displays the average rounded to 2 decimal places. I had not thought of excluding your own comments but that is a good idea. You really want to know what others do, not what you do. I will impliment this and see how it looks.
As for what you are seeing as your avreage, if you delete any images that had comments in them then your average would drop. You would have to drop one non commented image for every comment on a dropped image to keep your average from dropping. I think ;=] Sounds more like time for a big Sapporo at this end, too many numbers going through my head ;=]. Speak to you later.
Phil
|
|
Programmers Choice
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
Upload a Photo
Welcome Gayle. You have 2 uploads allowed today.
____________________________________________________________
Hi,Phil...the above message is what i see when clicked on "add a photo"....i uploaded only 2 last night PST,and never used the 3rd. allowance.....as a donor i thought i could upload 3 per day,but not sure if this is a bug,or i am missing something?.....regards,gayle
PST 7:22pm
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
You're welcome, Phil. I'll keep my eyes open and be sure to report any vagrant banner ads.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
I see. I mostly deleted photos with zero comments so I was expecting an increase in the average but it's no big deal either way. That Sapporo looks delicious, but it's lunch-time here... quite a wait before I can get to one!
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
Gayle, the way it is written it is 3 images in any 24 hour period, not per day such as it is. The same number of uploads just spread differently. So if you uploaded 3 images with the last one being only 12 hours ago and the other 2 being longer then 24 hours ago, you can upload 2 more right now and 1 more in 12 hours for example. Hope that is not too confusing.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
Before the upgrade, Phil, there was some discussion of how to avoid the problem that some people have with a rigid 24hr limit. If you have a particular time of day when it's convenient to upload (like me at the office, where lunch time is convenient), the rigid time limit means you gradually get later and later until you have to skip a day. Someone suggested that 25hr "days" would eliminate the problem; the extra hour would allow people to upload at ABOUT the same time EVERY day. It would not, of course, result in any significant increase in the total number of uploads. Did this get incorporated? If not, now might be a good time to do so and document it for the FAQ and for the next upgrade. (You probably don't want to think about that, yet!)
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
Ooops. For those puzzled by my comment just now, that should be 23hr days, not 25hr days. Sorry for any confusion. Only having to wait 23hrs would enable you to take up to an hour to upload your three photos and STILL be able to start at the same time the following day. Hope that's clearer...
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/15/2006
|
Roger, yes it is actually set to 23 hours and has been for quite a while.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/16/2006
|
Thanks for confirming that, Phil. I know it was the intention. But you responded to Gayle's query saying 24hr so it made me wonder if it was still on the "to do" list.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/16/2006
|
New one:
Why, when I am already a donor, does an ad appear suggesting that people might like to contribute on my behalf and make me a donor? I have no problems with appeals and/or suggestions to become a donor, but I do think the wording, at least, is inappropriate in this case. It's not just me--I see this on other donors' "intro" pages. This should surely appear on non-donors' intro pages.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/16/2006
|
Hi, Phil. It's me again. (!)
Another vagrant banner ad appears after I have uploaded a photo. Another page that hasn't got adaptive width yet.
|
|
|
|
Matej Maceas
(K=24381) - Comment Date 1/16/2006
|
If you are already a donor, people can prolong your donorship by another year.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/17/2006
|
Hi, Matej!
The VERY unlikely use of this feature seems considerably outweighed by the distraction. I can see it being valuable for those who are not already donors--some people cannot use PayPal or even credit cards from their countries, and some third-world students may well be deserving of a helping hand. But when you're already a donor? I think it could be dispensed with.
Of course anyone who wants to prolong my donorship is very welcome to do so. I won't hold my breath, though.
|
|
|
|
Tony Smallman
(K=16109) - Comment Date 1/17/2006
|
Neither ratings nor previous awards appear on my pages-is this a general problem?
|
|
|
|
karen clarke
(K=18847) - Comment Date 1/17/2006
|
I have a problem with one of my images. The title is ...NL... I put in that the aperture was set at f/3.5 but it keeps showing up on the image page as f/7. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Michael Grace-Martin
(K=10283) - Comment Date 1/17/2006
|
Definite layout/css problems in Mozilla and Firefox. The page overflows to the right of the screen (e.g., when looking at any of the main pages, including the home page).
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/17/2006
|
Michael, that is the first we have heard of this. What operating system are you using, what screen resolution are you running at and what versions of Mozilla and Firefox are you running.
Thanks,
Phil
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/18/2006
|
Phil, no awards show up on My Usefilm. I seem to remember getting a couple back in the early days...
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/18/2006
|
hi,Phil....i uploaded 3 shots and now when i click on them to check for comments,i get the "can't display page" message and so i click on the usefilm.com there on that message and get sent to front page of UF
Want to edit one shot and upload my 4th bonus one....can you help?
regards,gayle Tues. night 8:32pm PST
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/18/2006
|
Gayle, should be ok, we had a slight problem earlier but that has since been fixed. Let me know if you were able to upload your 4th image.
Phil
|
|
|
|
kl puckett
(K=1202) - Comment Date 1/19/2006
|
don't know if this is a bug or not, but I find that just about every other time I go to usefilm, I have to re-log in with the weird security word. I rarely ever had to re-log in before the upgrade. Not a big deal, but definitely an annoyance. I liked it when I could just open the page and go; I always use the same computer. I don't understand how it could be a security issue? It just happens all the time now...
But everything else is absolutely wonderful; thanks for all the hard work.
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/19/2006
|
KL what is the date time and year your clock says on your machine
|
|
|
|
kl puckett
(K=1202) - Comment Date 1/20/2006
|
hey admin,
7:55 pm January 19 2006
|
|
|
|
Jürgen Reinold
(K=1651) - Comment Date 1/20/2006
|
Technically not a bug, I guess, but a beloved feature still missing since the site change. When is the CSV statistics download going to come back? I am really getting withdrawal as I had these nice scripts analyzing every view and comment happening on my pictures. This may have been a little known feature of the old site but very very helpful.
Soon?
Jürgen
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/20/2006
|
That's such an interesting idea, Jurgen, that I think you ought to write an article about it for the new Articles section of Usefilm, share the scripts, and show us examples of how it works... (when they reintroduce this feature, of course ).
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/20/2006
|
The suggetions forum, in which this bugpost topic exists, has a banner ad across the top and also embedded in the first post. When you add a new topic to the donor forum, you also get a banner ad across the top of the entry page. The latter seems particularly inappropriate... (You DID ask me to mention instances of this, Phil.)
|
|
|
|
karen clarke
(K=18847) - Comment Date 1/20/2006
|
Another aperture problem with last shot (title: . ) Should read f/2.8. Thanks~
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/21/2006
|
I notice that the Google translation feature cannot handle accented characters. Since all of the languages other than English for which this service is offered use accents, this is a serious limitation in the usefulness of the feature. It has not been cured by having people click on the language pull-down. This generates the "translate" button as it should do, but not the right character set(s).
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/21/2006
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/21/2006
|
Roger can you give me an example of the translation problem, which image or forum comment so that I can see what it is doing. Not sure if the problem is here or at google.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/21/2006
|
Jurgen, can you please send me a copy of a typical CSV file, I had never used that option in the old system so not sure what was in it. Also would you prefer it to output in Excel format instead of CSV? email to suggest@usefilm.com and mark it to my attention.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/21/2006
|
OK, Phil. http://www.usefilm.com/Image.asp?ID=1028660 is a snapshot that Claude Tenot just commented on in French because he knows I read the language. I was interested to see how Google handled the translation, and when I clicked on "translate" Google inserted a question mark in place of every accented character and left each such word untranslated. Hope this helps... I'd be interested to hear what the problem is once you've tracked it down.
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/21/2006
|
Roger, Problem has been fixed with the translate function.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/21/2006
|
Good work, Phil. I just checked, and the translation is fine. Glad I brought it up... As I earn a good part of my living translating, I'm quite happy with the quality that Google provides.
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/22/2006
|
Send Me My Password
Sorry, there appears to be a problem with your account.
Please contact the system adminstrator.
| FAQ | Terms of Service | Donate | Site Map | Contact Us | Advertise |
Copyright ©2005 Photo Publishing Group, LLC - All Rights Reserved
Hi,Phil....the above error msg. is what donor member,Kambiz K (62738.html) saw when he tried to log in....i am trying to get him some help since he can't log in....his email is: kombizz@yahoo.com (he said he wrote to UF,but never received reply,but yahoo may have sent reply to junkmail/spambox and i told him to check there)
He is fairly new and just recently became a donor.....
Thanks for any help....regards,gayle
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/22/2006
|
Category and portfolio image counts are now fixed on the photographer public portfolio page
al
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/22/2006
|
"There is somethin' happenin' here
what it is ain't entirely clear
There is a comment following me there
and everrrrrrrry where...." (Buffalo Springfield band with a little poetic license on my part about the comment..LOL)
yes,Phil,my comments tonight are following me and appearing where i have not even left a comment,even on my own image page!...also,when i click on the "Add comment" button,it takes me to can't display page...i figured out that if i hit refresh after leaving the first comment before it actually shows that it posted,then it leaves only one,but then still follows me to next comment field.....didn't others have this same bug earlier this month?
Thanks.....will check back since back to not receiving forum comment notices in my email nor spambox.....regards,gayle
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/22/2006
|
this is a test comment posting in the forum to Gayle. Did you get this in your email?
Phil
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/22/2006
|
Phil, nope....no email from you and i checked my bulk mail,too
2:04am
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/22/2006
|
Test comment for gayle 2 30 pm est sunday
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
hi, received your test comment in my email today!......Thanks!
regards,gayle 5pm PST
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
hi, AL/Phil....decided to try leaving comments again today,but am still sent to "can't display page" and so i go back to image and hit refresh,check to see if comment posted, and then move on to next image where my previous comment follows me like white on rice!..LOL..
HEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLPPPPP! ;>
regards,gayle Seahawk Sunday (we won! on to Superbowl!)PST 8pm
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Email me the url of the page not found please. LOOK at the link in the browser
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Please email me the url asap
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
hi, tried to get it again with 2 test coms on 2 different images,but all is back to normal now,so whatever it was,you fixed it!...i didn't even log out and back in again.....if goes haywire again,i'll be back to let you know....thanks!.....regards,gayle
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
hi,i spoke too soon...was sent to "can't display page" again after writing comment to Hugo and hitting "Add comment".....here is the url when receive that error...
http://www.usefilm.com/Critique_Image_Upload.asp
it is 9pm PST and i will check back about 9:30pm....thanks,gayle
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Forgot to mention that my comments are following me again...they stopped for a short while and now they are back.....i sure don't envy you guys even for a nano second with these nagging little techie headaches!!!! ...LOL...later,gayle
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Gayle are you adding rating or just a comment
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
hi,i just now got message to log in when i tried to enter via your forum reply to me.....it took me 2 times before it accepted my password and now i am in.....9:27pm PST ~gayle
i will check to see if comments follow me or if i get the "can't display page" error again...
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Gayle I logged you out to clear your session. Let's see if that fixed the problem.
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
hi, i hit add comment and it took me here again:
http://www.usefilm.com/Critique_Image_Upload.asp
then i hit BACK and if i hit refresh,it will post my comment to person,then that comment will follow me again to another image
~gayle 9:39pm PST
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Phil, if you ever have a spare moment (ha!) I would be interested to know what the problem with ratings is. Every day or so I try the "top ratings" filter with the same result (you probably know, but anyway) I get just eight B&W photos that do not appear to be top-rated or even close. Are you perhaps doing a thorough revamp to try to normalize the subjective ratings into some form of comparability? And perhaps even going back over historial ratings to re-score them? If so, I can understand why it would take time. I remember how long it took last time, and the difficulty there was explaining the "hows" and "whys."
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Gayle email me your tel # to suggest@usefilm.com please
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Roger we are rescoring every image left since the site started, hence the delay
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
ok, i just left comment to Ann Nida and it posted as it should...comment didn't follow me to others images thus far....maybe this time it is fixed....fingers crossed...knock on wood...;>
Thanks,gayle
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
ok, will send the digita via suggest email addy.....gayle
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Thanks, Phil. Are you going to look at the other filters? The one for number of views in "Usefilm favourites" is strange, too. I note that one photo (er, mine ) with a large number of views doesn't appear where you would expect it to come.
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Roger, it is just a complicated formula. I have to convert it to the new system, write new routines and take into account other data. I want it to be accurate so I have not run the catch up script to bring all of the ratings up to date until it goes through some more testing. That, coupled with fixing bugs here and there, plus my need to work on projects that can bring in enough income to pay the bills I can only spend so many hours per day on this. So that is why it is taking a extra time. I hope you will understand and be patient, and I do appreciate your help and input in locating the bugs.
Phil
Phil
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Gayle, when it fails and leaves you on the critique-image_upload.asp page, let me know if there are any errors listed or line numbers that the error occured on. Then I can figure out what the problem is. Normally you would not stop on this page, it should post and then send you back to the image page you were on. So if it stops here there is a problem. Your comment following you around is because the very last thing it does before sending you back to the image page is to clear your comment memory. It is failing before it gets that far so the comment is still with you. You can clear it by closing down your browser and restarting it.
Thanks for the input,
Phil
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Phil, given responses like this, which make perfect sense, it is easy to be patient. Under the circumstances it is a pleasure to keep a watching brief for the occasional bug, especially as I now know reports are welcome in the same spirit of helpfulness with which they are made. I hope you can continue to find time for such replies, as I am surely not the only one who really appreciates the more open communications we enjoy recently. I hope the new system takes account of the fact that many people would rather give NO rating than one below "5." In other words, only the occasional exceptional photo gets the high 6s and 7s... so it may not be appropriate in this case to normalize them to a much lower rating "score." Those who ONLY and ALWAYS give 6s and 7s, well, it is hard to work out just what those scores mean... Just a thought...
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
hi,Phil...AL got it back to normal for me and it is working as it should...for now....no errors listed,nor line numbers...just the url i listed from the "can't diplay page" page it sent me to each time i hit "add comment"....will let you know if it happens again
Thanks!.....regards,gayle
|
|
|
|
Mark Julian
(K=35624) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Al or Phil, left a comment on http://www.usefilm.com/image/1033678.html and it keep going to some error message so I tried again a few times (even took out a sentence). When I checked back it posted/repeated 4 times. Like Gayle I also had the original message popping up when I'd go to other Photogs Portfolios. That seems to have stopped so it might just have been the NSA screwing with me - I don't know. Can you please wipe out all my comments after the first one on image 1033678.If I keep having the problem with a comment following me around tomorrow or whenever I'll leave a new comment here. I have to get off right now to do some paper work - check back later if possible (1am LA time). Thanks, Mark
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Mark, found the problem, all should be OK now. I will delete 3 of your 4 repeat posts if that is ok.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Mark Julian
(K=35624) - Comment Date 1/23/2006
|
Thanks Phil, I checked it out and if you could be so kind as to take off the last one on there since it just repeats the one above (so please just leave my first one on there). Thanks a Lot. Gotta get some sleep. Mark
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
hi,Phil.....i haven't been on usefilm all day...minutes ago i tried to leave comment to Ann Nida...i hit add comment and was sent to the "can't display page" page again.....no errors listed or line numbers,only the following url i copy pasted:
http://www.usefilm.com/Critique_Image_Upload.asp
I hit BACK and my comment was still in the field,so i hit Refresh and then my comment was posted on her image page.....sorry i will not be able to deal with this right now,but will check back later to see if you sent any reply....thanks,gayle 8pm PST
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
hi,Phil....it is 8:10pm PST and i left another comment to Ann Rida and this time all worked as it should!....so, it is an off n' on again problem for some odd reason......will keep you posted if it crops up again when i return to commenting later tonight...regards,gayle
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
Gayle email me when I can call you. We will try this again.
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
Gayle goto this in your browser:
Tools/ internet options/ advanced / make sure the box that says "SHOW FRIENDLY HTTP ERROR MESSAGES" is UNCHECKED
After that restart your browser and then try to trigger the error, when you see the real error please email it to suggest@usefilm.com so we can get this fixed today.
Al
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
(K=91003) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
hi,AL.....i did as your second reply said and i couldn't trigger the same error and i posted another comment with no probs, so that makes 3 thus far...should i leave that "show friendly http errors" unchecked,or go back to way it was?.....sorry,i have to scoot!
talk at cha' later.....thanks,AL....gayle
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
Gayle, Yes please leave that setting the way Al had asked. This way it will show the actual error so that we can trace it. The other way just said an error occurred but gave you no info as to what it was.
I think I found the bug anyway so I doubt you will see it again, but this setting is good to track down any other bugs out there.
Thanks for your assistance we really appreciate it.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Matej Maceas
(K=24381) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
Al, so if your previous mind-bursting super-advanced-statistics rating formula is going to be replaced, perhaps you could tell me what it was? ;-)
|
|
|
|
Matej Maceas
(K=24381) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
Comment rating links in the forums are not working in the way I assume they should, they're all just pointing to the thread where the comments have been posted.
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
Matej,
Forum Comment ratings are fixed as well Image Critique ratings. Let me know if you see any other problems.
Thanks,
Phil
|
|
|
|
Marvin Weston
(K=28) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
Hi Phil.
There is an "Adult" icon on one of the images in my portfolio that shouldn't be there.
Marvin Weston
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/24/2006
|
Marvin link me to to the page that you see them please
|
|
|
|
Marvin Weston
(K=28) - Comment Date 1/25/2006
|
WOW.... It seems to be gone now!
Sorry about wasting your time Al
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/25/2006
|
The filter of all Usefilm images does not seem to reflect your corrected ratings. When I submit a request for "top-rated" photos limited to B&W, I get only eight images and these are certainly not the top rated ones. Sorry to harp on about this, and it's fine if you are still working on it, but when you wrote that ratings were "fixed" I was expecting this to work, too.
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/25/2006
|
Roger, that was comment and critique ratings, (excellent, average, poor and abse) not the image ratings. Still working on image ratings.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/25/2006
|
Ah, I see. I wasn't even aware of a problem with those. I never bother to grade comments myself. Is there anywhere we can see what grades, if any, were given? Or what the average is? Or is it simply reflected in Karma in some way? I don't think I have ever seen an explanation of the intention behind this feature, unless (I seem to vaguely remember) an "abuse" rating flags a moderator to check whether it should be deleted...? is that it?
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/28/2006
|
Please post any new errors to the Bug #5 Thread
|
|
|
|
Phillip Cohen
(K=9533) - Comment Date 1/28/2006
|
Roger, the comment ratings are used as part of the formula for selecting the Featured Critique. And yes the Abuse rating is used to flag a moderator. We have added a new Poor rating. Before it was Excellent Average and Abuse, a rating can be poor without being abusive so we added the new Poor rating.
At present there is no public display of the comment ratings as it is primarilly for internal use. It does display what you had rated the comment at and you can change your mind, remove a rating or re-rate it if you wish.
Phil
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
(K=15779) - Comment Date 1/28/2006
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=83282) - Comment Date 1/29/2006
|
Thank you, Phil. This is all stuff for the FAQ, right? People other than me will ask, and "Look here" is the best reply!
|
|
|
|
