|
|
|
anandaroop ghosh
{K:1814} 3/13/2006
|
Hi Tim, this a fabulous composition. I looked long and hard to find a point of criticism, but I honestly can't. great DOF, details, framing and lighting. maybe the snow could be a little whiter, but that's really extreme nitpicking. stunning work. congratulations.
|
|
|
|
|
Dale Ann Cubbage
{K:9755} 3/13/2006
|
Wow, magical!
da
|
|
|
|
|
Ivan N. Prgonjic
{K:3038} 3/13/2006
|
It is a great image ... (Arches NP ?) Very well done :))
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Schumm
{K:28854} 3/13/2006
|
Yes this is Arches Nat. Park....amazing I could shoot 400 shots a day here.
|
|
|
|
|
sanjeev jain
{K:8549} 3/13/2006
|
excellent work i simply like ur composition my critique is since u insist beauiful work to critisise is not to be negative or positive but simply say what one feel i feel it is wonderful job done as the whole landscape and the sky looks to me very alive
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185017} 3/13/2006
|
Hi Tim,
Spectacular combination of landscape and sky, with a very well balanced composition, build up of interesting objects and a set of strong lines in it. No surprises there...:)
I do find the the dark parts in the tree and the rock formation a bit too dark, though, which rids them of details, texture and depth. Difficult to assess at the moment as I'm currently in a pretty bright room, so I'll have to take another look tonight.
The textures and details in the snow are superb, though, but I do feel that in order to get them this good, you had to sacrifice a bit of the clarity and crispness of the image, if you see what I mean. These are only very minor things, but you did put it in the Critiquer's Corner section...:)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Schumm
{K:28854} 3/13/2006
|
Hi Hugo,
Thanks for taking the time to access this image. On my monitor the details you are looking for are very aparent, perhaps yours is set up somewhat differently from mine or it is the sunlight as you have suggested.
Thank you again,
Cheers, Tim
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185017} 3/13/2006
|
Hi Tim, That might very well possible, and I'll definitely take another look tonight.
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
Debarshi Duttagupta
{K:26689} 3/13/2006
|
FANTASTIC !
|
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:138306} 3/13/2006
|
Great snow shot, Tim! Fantastic shapes with the small bushes, and I like gnarled appearance of the bush on the left. Those huge rock formations make an amazing landscape!
Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185017} 3/13/2006
|
Hi Tim, finally at home, with a better screen and better lighting. I agree, there is a lot of detail in the dark part, so please disregard my previous comment. The difference sure is substantial, quite interesting to see, actually. I never realised, nor noticed such a huge difference....:) Only one way to find out, I guess!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
Roberto Arcari Farinetti
{K:192044} 3/13/2006
|
woooww i hope in another award for you my dea friend.. another great work, for a joy of the snow!
fine texture
roby
favs..
|
|
|
|
|
Michalis Stama togiannis
{K:9944} 3/13/2006
|
Beautiful scenery.
Well done,
michalis
|
|
|
|
|
Sharrie Shaw
{K:944} 3/13/2006
|
Wow, truly dramatic! I was here around October & thought that was amazing enough. This is truly something!
A winner!
|
|
|
|
|
Serge Moscow_in_Milano
{K:661} 3/20/2006
|
1. Image looks a little bit dark for such a plenty of snow and sun light.
2. Composition is not balanced. Bush at foreground looks even a larger, that stones at background - it gives a sence of "false/not true/not real". Imho, of course.
All these for CC only.
Regards,
Serge
|
|
|
|
|
Bart Aldrich
{K:7614} 4/13/2006
|
Wonderful textrures between the soft, white snow & cluds and the gnarly wood of the tree. Very nice.
|
|
