|
|
|
violetta tarnowska
{K:23960} 9/27/2006
|
Wow! The style caused the uncanny effect - the scene looks like on the Moon! Splendid work!!!
Cordialities:)
Viola
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 9/27/2006
|
Thanks Viola . . . I was trying to emphasize the delicacy of the image and the clarity . . . and to have some fun too! Glad you enjoyed it!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Pablo Dylan
{K:53602} 9/27/2006
|
Excellent composition,very nice post work.
Pablo
|
|
|
|
|
Michele Carlsen
{K:128850} 9/28/2006
|
Very interesting Doyle ! Looks kind of like Mars or another planet ....it does show off the bridge perfectly tho !!!
Good work .
Michele~
|
|
|
|
|
Juan Gonzalo Marcano Prieto
{K:14224} 9/28/2006
|
bella muy bella, una mas para mis favoritas, excelente
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley D. Cross
{K:140722} 9/28/2006
|
Nice work, Doyle!
|
|
|
|
|
yasargun muslum
{K:5609} 9/28/2006
|
Excellent...
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly Duntley
{K:13055} 9/28/2006
|
What a surreal looking photo. The water looks like compact dirt,making one wonder why there is a bridge there. A fun picture to see.
Kelly
|
|
|
|
|
vanessa shakesheff
{K:62845} 9/28/2006
|
Great effect looks like the bridge has been on the moon ..very surreal ..nessa
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Slade
{K:40918} 9/28/2006
|
This is so effective. And great as panoramic. Atmospheric feel to this one Doyle.
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 9/28/2006
|
Thanks very much Pablo.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 9/28/2006
|
Thanks Michele! The details of the bridge was really what I wanted to emphasize. Once again . . . you've made my day! :)
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 9/28/2006
|
Thanks Juan . . . I think you've marked more of my shots as favorites than any three other people combined. It's very complimentary and certainly appreciated.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 9/28/2006
|
Thanks Shirley!!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 9/28/2006
|
Thanks Yasargun!!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 9/28/2006
|
Thanks Kelly . . . my intention was to define the detail in the bridge better . . . but it did make for a surreal composition! :)
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 9/28/2006
|
Thanks Nessa!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 9/28/2006
|
Heheheheee . . . like that term, Mary, Atmospheric. With the black sky and 'Lunar' feel it's almost Non-atmospheric literally but certainly atmospheric figuratively!! :)
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
AJ Miller
{K:44247} 9/28/2006
|
There's a couple of things I'm still trying to get my head around and learn to appreciate: one is fisheye lenses and the other is (you guessed it!) IR. So I whacked this up in full pano mode and was knocked out by the contrast of the bridge against the background. OK, I'm not yet fully convinced by the concept but I'm getting there. I did feel that the frame on this one got lost at the top of the image as it merged into the sky. Perfect pano subject though (and no foreground concrete!)
John
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley D. Cross
{K:140722} 9/28/2006
|
You're welcome, Doyle!:)
|
|
|
|
|
Shadi Porooshani
{K:9701} 9/28/2006
|
very good work bravoo so striking ;)
regards
shadi
|
|
|
|
|
Ezequiel Lozada
{K:17092} 9/29/2006
|
Strange and superb experiment, Doyle.
Nice wide presentation.
Very clear details.
Great work.
|
|
|
|
|
Riny Koopman
{K:58117} 9/30/2006
|
Absolutely beautiful shot, love the mood, well spotted! :) Best regards,riny
|
|
|
|
|
LGreget
{K:18536} 10/2/2006
|
I really have a lot to learn about PS. I had no idea you can add the effect of IR with PS.
Great point of view. Well seen and taken.
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 10/2/2006
|
Thanks Shadi . . . I appreciate that!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 10/2/2006
|
Hehehehee . . . stupid foreground concrete. I agreed with the IR until I looked into it more and compared B&W images with various IR shots (I like the Hoya 78 IR) . . . it does make improvement in SOME circumstances. The same holds true for the fisheye . . . check out http://www.usefilm.com/Image.asp?ID=882304 for a MASTER use of the fiseye . . . though I have seen others. They simply would not be the same otherwise. Of course the, by now cliche, ubiquitous shot of the Brooklyn Bridge is another case in point. The only problem is these Lens and filter venues are not good for most photographic needs and may be a tad bit overdone just to play with the effect (As I've done here). Good comment!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 10/2/2006
|
Thanks Eze! Very kind of you!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 10/2/2006
|
Thanks very much Riny!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 10/2/2006
|
Thanks very much Lisa.......:)
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Chin
{K:20390} 10/18/2006
|
Lovely image Doyle,excellent composed image
with very good tones.I have tried IR plugin before but far easier for me to shoot IR with R72.Your D50 is a fantastic IR camera using the R72 filter.Hope to see some R72 images soon.Taking a break from here hence the slow responce in saying thanks for your comment.
Take care
Robbie
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 10/18/2006
|
You're so right Robert and I'll be getting (since you mention it) the Hoya R72 IR filter . . . (it's on my TO DO list)! Thanks!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Chin
{K:20390} 10/19/2006
|
Here is my IR work flow as requested by a member.thought I should let you have it too.
http://www.usefilm.com/image.asp?ID=1199881&CID=6239659
Take care
Robbie
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 10/19/2006
|
Thanks Robert. Unfortunately, channels are only available in the full version of photoshop and that's something I don't have. I have PS Elements 4.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Arnold
{K:55583} 10/27/2006
|
Is this really a pano? You stitched this? from how many photos?
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:99839} 10/27/2006
|
Hi Dave . . . I'm not at home with my database yet but (as I recall) this was a less complex issue than I set out to do. I originally had shot three lower and three upper shots but as I recall needed only a very small portion of the upper right side tower . . . the remaining uppers were discarded . . . but it may have been two under and two over . . . :( . . . (Trying to recall how to spell Alzheimers) - Either way . . . I ended up with ONE top, no more . . . but there were several bridge panos . . . and at least one other was posted so it may just be the early onset of senility and not Alzheimers at all.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
