|
|
|
Dave Holland
{K:13038} 1/1/2008
|
Excellent sharpness in the eyes. White balance seems a little tungsten-shifted on my moniter - especially in the whites of his eyes -- is it the same on your moniter? I never did that important step of calibrating my moniter, so it could be me.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Holland
{K:13038} 1/1/2008
|
Excellent sharpness in the eyes. White balance seems a little tungsten-shifted on my moniter - especially in the whites of his eyes -- is it the same on your moniter? I never did that important step of calibrating my moniter, so it could be me.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Holland
{K:13038} 1/1/2008
|
Excellent sharpness in the eyes. White balance seems a little tungsten-shifted on my moniter - especially in the whites of his eyes -- is it the same on your moniter? I never did that important step of calibrating my moniter, so it could be me.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Holland
{K:13038} 1/1/2008
|
Excellent sharpness in the eyes. White balance seems a little tungsten-shifted on my moniter - especially in the whites of his eyes -- is it the same on your moniter? I never did that important step of calibrating my moniter, so it could be me.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Holland
{K:13038} 1/1/2008
|
Interesting photo. I presume you masked the eyes and laid a sepia cast to the rest of the slide.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Holland
{K:13038} 1/2/2008
|
Oh, sorry for the repeat comments. Usefilm wasn't apparently getting my comments, and I didn't know they would be recorded after the fact.
|
|
