|
|
|
Babak Bazaz
{K:831} 1/25/2008
|
Very nice photo and landscape dear rose
I think youd better use an iso 100 film for this sunny view.
|
|
|
|
Rose Hare
{K:2253} 1/25/2008
|
Thank you for the comment Babak. I am still learning what film is best for what photo's. Perhaps you can help me. What is the benefit of using a lower ISO for this view?
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:113245} 1/25/2008
|
Excellent capture of the colours and lighting, Rose! I like your composition of that massive rock formation, too.
Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
Babak Bazaz
{K:831} 1/25/2008
|
Youre welcome rose.
you see rose, when youre using a high iso (or formerly called ASA) film, the sensivity to light is higher comparing to a low iso one. its useful but here you have a victim and thats the quality. When iso is higher, the picture details(quality) come out to be lower.
Ofcourse when photographing indoors high iso would be useful, for example when taking a portrait, details are not an important consider but light is.
When your least f-number for example 1.4 still darkens your picture, the high iso would help you much (because each time you double the iso, means that you have changed your aperture number one step lower eg. f/1.8 with iso 200 equals to f/1.4 with iso 400).
In the picture youve taken details are important, because you have got small visual elements such as leaves of the trees so the lower iso would do something.
Besides when you lower the iso it means that you should have your f number changed to a higher one, so with a higher f number, the Depth Of Field (DOF) would be longer and its length is very useful in tele-photography (landscapes for example).
|
|
|
|
|
Rose Hare
{K:2253} 1/25/2008
|
Hello Babak
Thank-you for explaining the films. I am going to pick up some lower iso film and use them as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Oscar E. Flores H.
{K:5981} 1/26/2008
|
Muy buen paISAJE. eS CIERTO, HUBIERA SIDO MEJOR USAR ISO 100. sALUDOS
|
|
