|
|
Gabriella Carta
{K:22879} 11/28/2003
|
beautiful macro
|
|
|
|
|
Ste Mc
{K:2021} 7/30/2003
|
Thank you to everyone for your comments.
To Steve Bottom and Ferdinando Mondino: I know, it's a shame that the whole picture isn't really sharp, but that's the way it is with these close-up macro shots - the depth of field is only a few millimetres, so there's not much else I can do. Other people will normally crop the image so that only the sharpest bits are in the shot, but I liked the full-on picture of this fly so left it as it is. Let me know if either of you have tips for increasing the depth of field in extreme macro shots, as any helpful advice would be appreciated.
To Kristina: Thank you for your suggestions, I will try cropping the image tighter next time so that only the sharpest parts are in shot. I've since noticed that this is what other people who take similar shots do, so thank you for the tip!  )
Thanks,
Stephen
|
|
|
|
|
Shai Ritblatt
{K:3755} 7/9/2003
|
excellent macro shot !!!
|
|
|
|
|
Kristina Kohut
{K:49990} 7/9/2003
|
I actually disagree with comments about not enough sharpness, I think this is fantastic! That the wings are not sharp is not important for me, it's the face and eyes that is important I think. I really like this shot and I bet you can play around with composition a lot and make many different photos of just this one. For an example you could crop a bit on top and left and have it as a standing up shot. Then DOF will look different too.
|
|
|
|
Nando Mondino
{K:14261} 7/9/2003
|
Same comment as Steve Bottom
|
|
|
|
Jose Ignacio (Nacho) Garcia Barcia
{K:96391} 7/9/2003
|
beautiful image but the sharpness?you may look Chiapas.
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Bottom
{K:228} 7/9/2003
|
steve this is not a bad picture & i understand the difficulty involved but it is a shame that the wings are not as sharp as they could have been.
Regards
Steve
|
|
0 
