|
|
|
William R Eastman III
{K:2141} 6/17/2002
|
Wonderful photograph. I love the antique washed out quality. Was this a 28 or 35 mm lens. The fence/gate in the foreground rather than upstaging the barn--makes the photograph. Good eye!
|
|
|
|
|
Koen B
{K:3279} 6/17/2002
|
My guess is that the lens would be longer than 35mm :) Nice pic.
|
|
|
|
|
William R Eastman III
{K:2141} 6/17/2002
|
I agree with you Koen. It's just the depth of field and the gate in front that has me stumped. Probably just a standard 50 or so. I don't think I even own one anymore. Forgot you can do good stuff with a normal lens.
|
|
|
|
|
Lisa Brainard
{K:743} 6/17/2002
|
Oh you two, debating! It's a cheapie digital, fixed length lens. It's w-i-d-e, as those lenses tend to be. I don't even know... it says AF 4.5mm 1:2.8. Translate that for me. I liked the gate, too, especially the horseshoe on it. Guess it didn't mean much luck in the long run for this farmstead.
|
|
|
|
Wayne Harridge
{K:13852} 6/17/2002
|
Great shot !
By the way, the horseshoe is attached to the gate upside down, this is why all the luck ran out (so I've been told) !
|
|
