|
|
James Weber
{K:305} 8/22/2003
|
Beautiful time exposure. I disagree with you. 1/4 is perfect. I actually don't like it when it's to blurry. I like to see the lines of the water. Too long a time exposure and you lose that detail. Excellent capture.
|
|
|
|
|
SarahM none
{K:7836} 8/22/2003
|
I agree that it is an excellent capture, I love that you can see some of the detail of the rocks behind the falls. Great DOF. I also really like your composition with the foreground of the rocks. Super job!
|
|
|
|
|
Marti Buckely
{K:582} 8/22/2003
|
I'm a sucker for waterfalls. Wonderful use of slow shutter. Very pleasing. Looks like it was probably an overcast day as the lighting isn't the greatest. I'd be curious to see if a polarizer would bring out the rocks in the foreground a bit. Of course, then you might have too much competition with the waterfall. If you are nearby this scene where you can go back, depending on the position of the waterfall, I'd love to see it in either early morning or later afternoon light.
|
|
|
|
|
Carol Watson
{K:5185} 8/22/2003
|
Terrific shot!! Perfect display of the motion of the water without too much softness and blur... Makes me want to jump in and cool off. Nice work, Derek. :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan A. F. Kassler
{K:3727} 8/22/2003
|
Really great composition and the correct / good shutter speed.
Regards.
|
|
|
|
|
Akin Ozyazici
{K:4323} 8/23/2003
|
great shot, very nice perspect,
Regards Akin.
|
|
|
|
|
John Barclay
{K:3650} 8/23/2003
|
Hey Derek nice one! I actually like the 1/4 second exposure. In this case I think the lines it creates are very good. Did you use a polarizer? Do you have a netural Density filter to cut light for longer exposures? Cheap filter if you want longer exposure time...
|
|
|
|
|
Romy Fabian Garmaz
{K:16997} 2/12/2005
|
Excellent shot and timing. Very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Régnier Я£
{K:62830} 2/19/2007
|
Very very beautiful Derek!!!
Leo
|
|
