Usefilm Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Film and Digital Photography


beyond the gate, for sarah...
Image Title:  beyond the gate, for sarah...
 
 By: andrew vonbank  
  Copyright ©2003



 Browse Images
  Recent Pictures
  Todays Pictures
  Yesterdays Pictures
  1 Year Ago Today
  Summary Mode
  All Usefilm Pictures
 
 Image Options
  Staff Choice
  Editors Choice
  Featured Donors
  Featured Photographers
  Featured Photos
  Community Favorites
  Unrated Images
  Featured Critiques
  Critique Only Images
  Critiquer's Corner
  Images With No Critiques
  Random Images
  Panoramic Images
  Images By Country
  Images By Camera
  Images By Lens
  Images By Film/Media
   
 Categories
   
 Projects
   
 Find Member
Name
User ID
 
   

 

Photographer andrew vonbank {K:2811}
Project N/A Camera Model Nikon D1H
Categories Infrared
Film Format
Portfolio Lens Nikkor 24mm
Uploaded 8/28/2003 Film / Memory Type lexar media compact flashcard
    ISO / Film Speed 0
Views 223 Shutter 1 second
Favorites Aperture f18
Critiques 7 Rating
5.29
/ 5 Ratings
Location City - 
State - 
Country -   
About Closer and closer. You read my mind, Sarah Hansagard! I have always been interested in the hidden gardens behind this and other gates along Summit Avenue, too. So I propped up my tripod and took a "blind shot" for the benefit of my prurient interest and yours.
Random Pictures By:
andrew
vonbank


tall fence

light from above

daydream1

grass road fence

lone road

abstract capitol

Seldovia Harbor, Alaska

mako sica

Hosta

Taste Buds of a House Fly

There are 7 Comments in 1 Pages
  1
Marcel Laurens   {K:3639} 8/28/2003
i like the detail and IR effect - i think the shadow at the bottom is a bit distracting


buzz kill   {K:1808} 8/28/2003
interesting, neat, but doesn't do anything for me


Lexie Summers   {K:2027} 8/28/2003
Beautiful infrared. You did a very good job taking this photo "blind". Composition is wonderful.


andrew vonbank   {K:2811} 8/28/2003
You're absolutely right, Marcel. I did crop off a lot of the bottom shadow prior to post to balance the image, but I see your point. Could be cropped to just above the shadow and just below the right leading hedge. Good eye, man. Peace.


Betsy Hern   {K:12872} 8/29/2003
Andrew, Andrew, Andrew, my dear friend, I could never be mad at you. You only say what you think, bravo, I wish more here would do the same. You are one whose opinion I value, so don't change. I love it when I, or anyone else for that matter, gets a bunch of comments leaning one way then someone speaks up to point out an alternative way of looking at the image. Makes me reassess and I get more from those comments than the pats on the back. I desperately want to comment that way on some images here, but usually chicken out... I just got some new close-up lenses for my Yashica and am taking in a roll of b/w in today, wish me luck. I think I screwed things up though because this crazy camera has a viewing lens and a taking lens and once I got things focused with the close-up lens on the viewing, then moved it to the taking I didn't compensate for the difference in distance -- they call this parallax error. Anyway, the photos should come out interesting. Maybe I'll pass them off as coming out just the way I intended, whatcha think? Peace, love and rock 'n roll!


Mark James   {K:980} 8/30/2003
...Love the IR effect - I would like to e-mail you about your IR technique.....
If you have time drop me a note...

markphotog@yahoo.com

thanks,

good work!

Mark
Mankato, MN


Sarah Hansegard   {K:4332} 8/30/2003
Boy Andrew, you got me blushing now.
Thanks for the peek! *Wonderful photo*. What a cool space for someone to have.

Sarah


  1

 

|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2005 Photo Publishing Group, LLC - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.359375