|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 10/2/2003
|
I like the work with lights (quality on the left side, and catchlights in eyes), but the softness of the "after" image seems unwarranted. Thanks for the detailed explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
nathan combs
{K:2233} 10/3/2003
|
i a gree with that comment that i really did not have to soffen up this photo and it did look good severl other wase i did it up the reson it is soft becuse i never dun a photo like this with this modal i like this one and i felt like it looked good soft i had 6 other versons of it 1. was more cool a nether was B&w ect but this is what i wonted i deleated the others so the only reson i maed it soft was to show her soft sied not the freeky sied most of the photos i dun of her show she really is a kind i hope i making sence lol if you under stand yhis let ne know lol
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 10/3/2003
|
Makes good sense to me. I like the shot and I think that it is a good idea to work out many different solutions, it's a good way to build experience for the future (I don't do enough of it). Looks like somebody rearranged the keys on your keyboard at times - fast typer? :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Neil Cowley
{K:125} 10/23/2003
|
Rescuing photos through photoshop doesn't make good photos.
|
|
|
|
|
nathan combs
{K:2233} 10/23/2003
|
i very much disagree this photo was maed for a client wiched i got $$$ for it is exacly what the clinet was looking for lol ps is the best thing to happen to photography since it was invented PS makes photogphers $$$$$ and grate photos
|
|
