|
|
|
Raul Garcia
{K:649} 10/31/2003
|
Even I love b&w, in this case I like more the color one probably because it gives more information.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Marriner
{K:6657} 10/31/2003
|
The colour one. At this small size, there is not enough detail in the leaves for the B&W to show its strengths.
|
|
|
|
|
ryan winton
{K:3027} 10/31/2003
|
heres some images close up to give you an idea of the movement, there from the upper right hand side of the image
|
|
|
|
|
ryan winton
{K:3027} 10/31/2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ryan winton
{K:3027} 10/31/2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Marriner
{K:6657} 10/31/2003
|
Yeah, now for the detail and motion effect I prefer the B&W one (reminiscent of those Japanese cherry blossum paintings), but for the larger scene I like the vibrant display colour.
|
|
|
|
|
Robin McAulay
{K:8908} 11/1/2003
|
the second - mainly because the b/w adds a different dimension to an otherwise normal picture - interesting presentation
|
|
|
|
|
Joel Bonda
{K:725} 11/1/2003
|
Of these two I'm partial toward the black & white. I like the contrast between the tree and the leaves. I don't know much about digital, but with b&w film and a red filter, the fall leaves like that would have a glow to them that is missing here. Good shot and thanks for the exercise.
|
|
|
|
|
Kate Hargraves
{K:1617} 11/1/2003
|
I like the b&w one - its graceful.
or make a presentation of them both.. they are both really interesting.
Although.. the more I look at it the more distance I see in the color shot.. and I kinda like that. Yeah I say put them together and make them one picture :)
|
|
|
|
|
Rawabi Al-Nuaimi
{K:15659} 11/3/2003
|
I know my answer is lame but I'd pick the first one.. somehow colors attract me the most! i can't make myself convert any of my pix to b&w even though i know i'm missing a lot!!! :-s
but great composition and details..
|
|
