|
|
|
Rachel Leah
{K:25857} 1/4/2004
|
Great picture! I love the sharpness, coloring and lighting! It's really a great shot!
~Rachel~
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Heinze
{K:102} 1/4/2004
|
Very sharp and well exposed. IMO you need a big moon for these kind of shots = use as much telephoto as possible - at least 300mm and preferably 500mm+.
|
|
|
|
|
Antonella Nistri
{K:21867} 1/5/2004
|
Very nice photo although I agree with Tom. Overall very crisp and appealing image, Antonella
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Goldstein
{K:21230} 1/5/2004
|
Good try on this. I've attempted to do the same at different locations with similar results. A double exposure really is the best way to go. I think the interest for my eye is the detail of the mountain. The amount of sky in your image seems a bit much. This isn't helped by the fact that the moon is so small. As mentioned by Tom a double exposure would work better here. I've had luck with 300mm lenses. You generally don't want your moon to be too big. At least if you're looking for something semi-photorealistic. Also if you do try double exposures with the moon that when you shoot the moon to follow the sunny 16 rule. The moon technically is a sun lit object.
|
|
|
|
|
Don Loseke
{K:32503} 1/5/2004
|
Great colors and detail. I do think that you could crop some from the top. The snow topped peaks are very interesting. Don.
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Whiteman
{K:2261} 1/6/2004
|
For some reason I like all that sky and I'm thinking of getting a large print. I've done double-exposures with a big moon but this is all the lens I have for this camera for now and it's close to maxed out here.
|
|
