Usefilm Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Film and Digital Photography


Lonesome
Image Title:  Lonesome
 
 By: Michael Kanemoto  
  Copyright ©2004



 Browse Images
  Recent Pictures
  Todays Pictures
  Yesterdays Pictures
  1 Year Ago Today
  Summary Mode
  All Usefilm Pictures
 
 Image Options
  Staff Choice
  Editors Choice
  Featured Donors
  Featured Photographers
  Featured Photos
  Community Favorites
  Unrated Images
  Featured Critiques
  Critique Only Images
  Critiquer's Corner
  Images With No Critiques
  Random Images
  Panoramic Images
  Images By Country
  Images By Camera
  Images By Lens
  Images By Film/Media
   
 Categories
   
 Projects
   
 Find Member
Name
User ID
 
   

 

Photographer Michael Kanemoto {K:22103}
Project N/A Camera Model Nikon D70
Categories Landscape
Travel
From The Field
Film Format
Portfolio The West
Lens Nikon  18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED AF-S DX
Uploaded 10/18/2004 Film / Memory Type 2.0 GB IBM Microdrive
    ISO / Film Speed 0
Views 213 Shutter
Favorites Aperture f/
Critiques 8 Rating
5.83
/ 3 Ratings
Location City - 
State -  IDAHO
Country - United States   United States
About An Idaho Ranch House. Inspired by Carol Waton's photography.
Random Pictures By:
Michael
Kanemoto


Butterfly

Riverside Geyser

Iced over

Lily vi

Rural Barn B+W

Prarie Spiderwort ii

Descending Orbits

CanyonStripe

Prairie Spirit Trail

Clasp

There are 8 Comments in 1 Pages
  1
Michele Berti   {K:14921} 10/18/2004
Another great one Michael. Really nicely composed ant the sepia tone add a lot here. Congrats my firend!


Michael Kanemoto   {K:22103} 10/18/2004
Thanks - if you want to partner sometime on a photograph let me know. mkanemoto at gmail dot com. I've tried it once now, and it was a fun experience to try to tweak out someone else's work.


Howard M. Parsons   {K:3496} 10/18/2004
Beautiful shot


Romulo Lubachesky   {K:11836} 10/19/2004
Beautiful work, my best regards!
7/7


Hugo de Wolf   {K:185005} 10/20/2004
Hi Michael, very well composed as well as exposed, but I feel the sepia toning is a bit "forced". Looking at the lighting and the gradient in the sky, I can imagine the colour version could also be awesome, given enough saturation....

Cheers,

Hugo


Michael Kanemoto   {K:22103} 10/20/2004
Hugo:

Better? I "turned down" the tone by 50%. Or is the photograph maybe overall too dark? Thanks for the comments, I'll adjust to any suggestion.



Michael Kanemoto   {K:22103} 10/20/2004
Hugo -

You have a fantastic eye. I went back into the image and realized I had not set the brighness or contrast. So the photograph is dark. Try this one on for size.

Same toning, corrected levels.



Hugo de Wolf   {K:185005} 10/20/2004
Hi Michel, I find it difficult to say if the second verison is better than the first. The tone is a bit colder, mainly changing the atmosphere. The tonal range is quite good in both of them, but the level correction you applied in the third version is definately an improvement; it creates a much stronger contrast and depth... It does look more natural and appealing.

In all fairness, what I really meant in my first comment, is that I think a colour version would be more suitable for such a shot. In many cases, a b&w or sepia conversion give an image a timeless look, but I also think it should be handled with care. It's not a guarantee for an artistic image, nor for a appropriate atmosphere. In other words, generally speaking, I feel it's applied too often. In this case, I can imagine the colour version is quite stunning, too.. Obviously, that's a personal opinion, and especially the third one strikes a chord.

Cheers,

Hugo


  1

 

|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2005 Photo Publishing Group, LLC - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.4375