|
|
|
Teunis Haveman
{K:52857} 11/16/2004
|
Jeantte, again beautiful green
An nice serie from architecture
teunis
|
|
|
|
|
Marcus Armani
{K:36597} 11/16/2004
|
very nice shot, good perspective
|
|
|
|
|
Mik Teige
{K:2311} 11/16/2004
|
Nice (image, portfolio). Mik
|
|
|
|
|
. .
{K:16329} 11/16/2004
|
If this building were a government project in Seattle the roof would be leaking already.
|
|
|
|
|
Rebecca Raybon
{K:26645} 11/16/2004
|
Lovely colors and perspective.
|
|
|
|
Saeed Al Shamsi
{K:47727} 11/16/2004
|
Cool,lovely reflection on the window glass,brilliant idea,Saeed
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Dong
{K:1738} 11/16/2004
|
Interesting series of photographs. Those curtains are such an ugly shade of green, glad I don't have them in my house.
I think these last 3 shots would look very interesting on Polaroid, the colors would take on a nostalgic character; the kind of colors we used to see in homes in the 50s and 60s.
|
|
|
|
|
Marco Maresca
{K:14418} 11/16/2004
|
Good photo!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Gaither
{K:32265} 11/17/2004
|
Great capture and image.
|
|
|
|
|
. Icerock
{K:4873} 11/17/2004
|
Nice seen .. ir
|
|
|
|
|
S.D Holmes
{K:7099} 11/20/2004
|
Lol - great shot Jeanette : you know i prefer your reds but this green came out very nicely :)
|
|
|
|
|
João Magalhães
{K:2067} 11/26/2004
|
I'm glad you resisted to push colors in this series.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeanette Hägglund
{K:59855} 11/26/2004
|
Hmmm, what do you mean? Irony? I think there?s a lot of colour, but i promise you that all of them are true!!!!!
Jeanette
|
|
|
|
|
João Magalhães
{K:2067} 11/27/2004
|
That's what I mean, they're true, with glare and all. It would be (to me, and still now) a temptation to push contrast, saturation, black point and do something like the thing below. No irony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeanette Hägglund
{K:59855} 11/28/2004
|
Not bad at all João - it?s almost better than mine! The hard contrast was good.
Jeanette
|
|
|
|
|
João Magalhães
{K:2067} 11/29/2004
|
Hm maybe, but it's imaginary. At least because I never saw the building :-) Or, in another way, should I please my senses or be truthful? Should I care for end results or the subject? "What is truth" anyway? That is, if most of the time I care above all about end results, should I take them into visual pleasure or -- if contradicting -- fidelity to the reproduction of our world as drab as it might be? Once I'd answer one of the ways, now another. In that sense again, Stephen Shore (after the Eggleston shock) brought me a new answer (see http://www.masters-of-photography.com/S/shore/shore.html if you wish) in favour of truthfulness and in detraction of pure visual pleasure. Aesthetics is about pleasure, truth is about logic and morals I think. Sorry about this rant! It has been very important to me lately. I seem unable to conciliate reality and pleasure.
|
|
