|
|
|
Christopher Robinson
{K:139} 1/23/2005
|
WOW.
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly Anbach
{K:4372} 1/23/2005
|
Steve,
Beautiful shot. I too own that lens and it does the job. Nice crisp shot.
Kelly
|
|
|
|
|
Gord Runtz
{K:3248} 1/23/2005
|
Now that's detail!!!
Nice job Steve!
Gord
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Prebble
{K:1168} 1/23/2005
|
Great shot, sharp
|
|
|
|
|
Angela Fox
{K:660} 1/23/2005
|
Another WOW here! That is so amazing!
I have to say, I am VERY jealous! Actually, although I say I have the 70-200 L with image stabilizer, it's actually a Sigma 70-200 with image stabilizer. I don't mean to tell lies, they don't give a sigma option. I would absolutely love to have 400mm L series lense. Actually, any L series lense...
I hope to buy a macro lense for this summer. I'm actually looking into buying a Canon Mark II, 1D.
Maybe I should stick to my 10D and buy that L series after all.
|
|
|
|
|
Marcus Armani
{K:36597} 1/23/2005
|
Awsome shot Steve, the detail is amazing, I think I can see you in the birds eye :), dont give canons IS the credit, Its the photographer....
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick Barbary
{K:572} 1/23/2005
|
Great!
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Houtmeyers
{K:3519} 1/23/2005
|
Sharp,Sharp,Sharp!!!!!!!!! Awesome photo , good clarity and details.
|
|
|
|
|
Ilona Krijgsman
{K:10405} 1/23/2005
|
Just a hansome bird, and such a lovely feathers...a perfect razor-sharp shot....love the refelction in the eye too....
|
|
|
|
|
Michael M.
{K:1194} 1/23/2005
|
This is beautiful!
|
|
|
|
|
Istvan VARKONYI
{K:3770} 1/24/2005
|
Tom, it is very lovely! Great!
Istvan
Please write me the " recipe" of the nois reducuction. I have problems whit Pro1 at ISO 400.
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Tomkinson
{K:3225} 1/24/2005
|
I use a plugin for Photoshop called NeatImage. You have to pay for it, it's about US $25. In the UK that's about £13 at the moment. Why don't you email me a photo, let me run it though the plugin, then I'll send it back to you. Then you can see if it's worth the money?
my email: tommorules@ntlworld.com
Cheers Steve (not TOM!!!!)
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Tomkinson
{K:3225} 1/24/2005
|
You have a tough but enjoyable choice to make! My guess is that in 2 years the 1D Mark II will be old news (the 10D & 20D even more so) & the 100-400 will still be a great lens. I know which will depreciate faster!
A good A4 print with a 10D or 20D will still look just as good in 2 years time!!
Regards
Steve.
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret Sturgess
{K:49403} 1/25/2005
|
Now then - you talked about my horse shot being an advert for hair gel this is new age hair product hair advert - sleek or what. Excelllent, what fabulous detail, and that reflection in his eye Great work
margaret
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Christensen
{K:18843} 2/9/2005
|
Steve
Great detail, colors, composition. I just got the 100-400 Lens and ope to get bird shots like this. I am still waiting for decent light, its been overcast since I picked it up..
jimc
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Tomkinson
{K:3225} 2/11/2005
|
Jim, I know what you mean, I bought 100-400 just before Christmas & it seems like I've been stuck on ISO 800 ever since. Very frustrating!
|
|
