|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 2/9/2005
|
Is it my eyes, or does this one have a slight lean to the right, Roger? Whatever, it's another interesting and well taken glimpse of your home city.
Best regards, Chris
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:84106} 2/9/2005
|
You may be right, Chris. I'm normally pretty quick to spot this, so I would guess it's within one degree... well spotted, sir!
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Naylor
{K:13064} 2/9/2005
|
The issue I have with this version is the wasted space at the top. There's a half of the photo which isn't doing anything, in fact I think it unballances all the detail in the bottom half.
Crop at least half of it ;-)
K
Just read Chris's post, and I see the lean too, in fact I saw it in the other version. I put it sown to the path not being level and therefore an optical illusion.
|
|
|
|
|
Amitava Banerjea
{K:7076} 2/9/2005
|
The landscape version works much better, IMO. The bland sky is the issue here, but I suspect cropping it drastically will not really improve it.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:84106} 2/10/2005
|
I must confess I posted this for the person who was with me rather than in any confidence it was up to standard. It looked straight in the viewfinder but I can see the "lean" now. The path DOES slope slightly, by the way... You're probably right that it can't be saved. Thanks for keeping me honest!
|
|
|
|
|
Amitava Banerjea
{K:7076} 2/10/2005
|
Any time, Roger:-) Reciprocation will be appreciated too. Didn't mean to be harsh, just that I preferred the landscape version. I would have loved to have been there. Honestly, I can't see the "lean"; my balance organs must be fading:-)
|
|
