|
|
|
Steve Tomkinson
{K:3225} 6/3/2005
|
Hello again Leslie, I love this!! Very subdued lighting, but it is subtle & for my money works really well - as nature intended.
I don't have the 50mm 1.8 in my 'arsenal', please could you tell me what the minimum focus distance is, you are really close here - or did you use extension tubes??
Regards
Steve.
|
|
|
|
|
Jose Ignacio (Nacho) Garcia Barcia
{K:94480} 6/3/2005
|
wonderful composition. (thanks.)
|
|
|
|
|
Leslie Cohelan
{K:20887} 6/3/2005
|
.45m/1.5 ft....and yes I was close...this lens suprises me all the time...I just printed a 12 x 16 of this one and impressed myself :)
no extension tube and there is some post work to accentuate the subdued light as it was early morning
|
|
|
|
Laurie Gould
{K:11936} 6/3/2005
|
Beautiful detail on this butterfly. Great capture! :)
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Tomkinson
{K:3225} 6/3/2005
|
Well I think the 1.8 has gone onto my Christmas list! Superb clarity, thank you for the reply!!
Have a great weekend,
Steve.
|
|
|
|
|
Don Loseke
{K:32503} 6/4/2005
|
Wow Leslie, this is wonderful. The lighting along with your famous touch make this beautiful.
This butterfly looks somewhat bigger than that we have had here. Ours are about 1 1/2 to 2 inches when wings are folded up. Thanks for sharing. Don.
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Goldstein
{K:21230} 9/9/2005
|
Beautiful capture. I like how this is presented but almost feel you could crop this more to show greater detail in the wings, thorax and head of the butterfly.
|
|
