|
|
Roger Williams
{K:83282} 7/7/2005
|
Ummm, why post the negative, Mark? Does it look better this way? I am tempted to dowload it and see what the positive looks like but I'm too lazy. But then again perhaps this ISN'T a negative (there's not much colour of any kind in the treeline), and this is some kind of insider joke?
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Collier
{K:19076} 7/7/2005
|
...very cool - I go for midnight - those look like parked witches brooms - cool shot - K
|
|
|
|
|
Marian Man
{K:69433} 7/7/2005
|
wow!!! nice!!!! different but wonderful!!! I like it dear Mark
best regards
Marian
|
|
|
|
|
- -
{K:6282} 7/7/2005
|
quite intrigued by this. as if an activity I can't figure out was abandonded.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Drago
{K:10869} 7/7/2005
|
hi Roger, I took this shot in April, and have looked at it occasionally since, wondering what, if anything, to do with it-- only because it appealed to me. I liked the arrangement of the poles. but the shot was too bland. The poles and the background did not make a strong shot. I tried various things, but finally thought of a way to bring them (the poles) out. I'm no artist--please. but I have an artist's sensibility, I like to think.
thus endeth this lesson. original below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:83282} 7/8/2005
|
Ah, I see. You're absolutely right, the version you posted does look much better. Thanks for the detailed reply. Much appreciated! I think I learned something this time!
|
|
