|
|
|
Elena Zabelina
{K:23212} 7/28/2005
|
It's AMAZING photo, Randy. Very artistic and creative image, and if it's digital copy of your 35 mm film photo, well then it's real (without Photoshop work) shot. It's very fantastic too, because now almost everybody use digital editing. I even can't belive, it's possible to do this miracle photo without Photoshop or so on. You are really MASTER. Beautiful lighting and color...I love it so much...
Best wishes,
Lena
|
|
|
|
|
Randy Libner
{K:1691} 7/28/2005
|
Thank you Elena. Artistry is one thing, being in the right place at the right time I have found is most important.
I went back to this place exactly one month later. It's 140 miles away, and 30 miles up into the hills from the nearest town. I shot two rolls of film........ and only in color do they compare. I tried to get to "artistic" with the moon's placement in the photos and it just didn't look as good as this one where I shot from instinct.......... a month later, the snow on the limbs was gone too. The snow was a nice little bonus.
Thank you for the kind words. If I didn't have the money invested in my current equipement, I would probably be shooting digital by now. I still like my slides better except for the difficulty of showing them.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Partida
{K:418} 8/5/2005
|
I do enjoy this more than the B&W version, this shows off a lot more feeling and is more of a piece that can be looked at. Great job, especially with the pgotographing a photo. That's not easy.
-Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Randy Libner
{K:1691} 8/5/2005
|
Thanks Chris. The original print I had made is 16 by 24 plus the mat width. I was very pleased with the color intensity. Color would be my choice too, but I thought I woud try it in B/W for fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Mellen
{K:7962} 8/19/2007
|
Another outstandingly beautiful photo. Shooting pictures under glass is difficult to do, I have shot some under museum quality glass with good results, a big difference over standard glass.
Excellent work! .... Mike
|
|
