|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 8/9/2005
|
Good detail, Roger, but given it's a crop from a larger shot I'm not sure why you took his feet off and left the space above his head!
Best regards, Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Thornton
{K:26442} 8/9/2005
|
There's a sort of fascinating symmetry to this. Straightforward. No nonsense. Maybe your impression of how this character really was. I also second Chris's comments about the lack of feet showing.
In other news, I received the 50mm finder for my T yesterday. Now, I am waiting for the lens . . . a 50/1.5 Summarit, which I have always liked. It is not considered an outstanding Leitz lens by most experts.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:84106} 8/9/2005
|
No feet, Chris, only the plinth on which the statue stood.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:84106} 8/9/2005
|
When I get to work tomorrow, Christ, I'll post a smaller version of the full frame (which I briefly posted but dcided to "pull" because of the first comment...). There really are no more feet than I've shown here. Maybe I should have included the plinth...
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 8/9/2005
|
Aahhh?
So!
Best regards, Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:84106} 8/10/2005
|
Here's the shot I was telling you about, Chris. See what I mean?
|
Full Size Shot |
|
|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 8/10/2005
|
I see it now, Roger!
He was obviously 'foot free and fancy loose'!  )
Best regards, Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:84106} 8/10/2005
|
I was a bit concerned that some people might take him as a rather fierce woman with those skirts. They're actually no more feminine than the Scotsmen who wear kilts, which is not at all! LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:69853} 8/13/2005
|
Sepia certainly does su9it this, Roger.
You have posted over a dozen shots since I have had a chance to look and my next couple of days are going to be quite busy--little or no computer time. So, I can't comment on as many of your shots as I would like.
Mary
|
|
